Latest results:
Latest results:
No page matches. Try a tool name such as Gemini or Turnitin.
AI is often right but not reliably accurate. In the EBU/BBC study, 45% of news answers from four AI assistants had at least one significant issue. NewsGuard found 10 leading chatbots repeated false news claims 35% of the time. Use AI for drafts and leads, and check anything that matters.

Each page below gives one verdict, the published results behind it with dates and sources, and a short routine for checking that tool's answers. Verdicts use four words: Reliable, Mostly reliable, Mixed and Unreliable. How we score AI accuracy explains how each verdict is reached.

ChatGPT had a significant issue in 36% of news answers in the EBU/BBC study and repeated false news claims 40% of the time in NewsGuard's August 2025 audit.

Gemini was worst of four assistants in the EBU/BBC study at 76%, mostly on sourcing, but second best of 10 in NewsGuard's audit at 16.67%.

Claude repeated false news claims 10% of the time, the lowest of 10 chatbots in NewsGuard's audit, and Claude Opus 5.5 scores 48 on the AA-Omniscience index, second highest.

Perplexity was the best citer in two news studies, wrong on 37% of Tow Center source lookups, but repeated false news claims 46.67% of the time in NewsGuard's audit.

Copilot had a significant issue in 37% of news answers in the EBU/BBC study and repeated false claims 36.67% of the time in NewsGuard's audit.

Grok 3 named the wrong source for 94% of news excerpts in the Tow Center test, and 154 of its 200 citations led to error pages.

DeepSeek failed 83% of NewsGuard's news prompts in January 2025 and misattributed 115 of 200 sources in the Tow Center test.

Meta AI repeated false news claims 40% of the time in NewsGuard's August 2025 audit, tied with ChatGPT, and Meta has admitted hallucinations about breaking news.

AI Overviews answered 91% of SimpleQA questions correctly in the NYT and Oumi analysis, but 56% of answers were not supported by their cited sources, as reported by Futurism.
No tool has this verdict in the current results.
No single test measures "accuracy". Each one checks a different skill, so a tool can do well on one and badly on another. Gemini is the clearest case: last in one news study, second in another audit.
Vectara and AA-Omniscience test the models behind the apps, not the apps themselves. Our tool pages say so wherever those results appear. The full model table is on AI hallucination rates by model.
No AI assistant in these tests was right every time, so the safe habit is the same for all of them: check what matters.
Every tool page carries one of four words, set from the dated evidence on that page.
At or near the top in every independent test that includes the tool, with errors rare enough that only high-stakes answers need a check.
Best or near the top in most independent tests that include it, with one clear weak area named on its page.
Strong in some independent tests and weak in others, or middle-of-the-pack across them. Answers need checking.
At or near the bottom in most independent tests that include it, or a pattern of invented sources. Treat every answer as a lead only.
A verdict is a summary, not a guarantee. Read the results table on each page to see what was measured and when.
How we scoreShort answers, with links to the dated evidence.
Not without checking. In the EBU/BBC study of 2025-10-21, 45% of news answers from ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Perplexity had at least one significant issue. AI is useful for drafts, summaries and finding leads. For facts you will publish, submit or act on, confirm each one in a primary source first.
Claude has the strongest overall record in published tests. It repeated false news claims 10% of the time in NewsGuard's August 2025 audit, the lowest of 10 chatbots, and Claude Opus 5.5 scores 48 on the AA-Omniscience index, second highest. Perplexity is the best at citing news sources. The full order is on our most accurate AI ranking.
Each tool runs a different model, searches different pages and is tuned to answer or hold back in different ways. The same tool can also give different answers to the same question. That is why one assistant can top one test and trail in another, as Gemini did in the EBU/BBC study and NewsGuard's audit.
Open every source the AI gives and confirm the page says the same thing. Search the key name, number or quote yourself. Check figures and dates in the original document. Look up legal or academic citations in their own databases. Our five-step routine on how to fact-check an AI answer covers each step with free tools.
You can trust AI to be useful, not to be right every time. Results vary widely by tool and task: Claude repeated false claims 10% of the time in NewsGuard's audit, while Grok 3 named the wrong source 94% of the time in the Tow Center test. Treat an AI answer as a lead to confirm, never as the final source.
Where to go next on the bench.